Compare VisoTrust with Auditive

Overview of VISO TRUST and Auditive

Both VISO TRUST and Auditive use AI to improve how organizations evaluate vendor risk, but they are built for very different scopes of risk management.

Auditive positions itself around AI agents that help procurement and risk teams process vendor documentation and compliance artifacts faster. Its focus is accelerating document intake and analysis within procurement workflows.

VISO TRUST, by contrast, delivers a complete third-party risk management platform, enabling enterprises to onboard vendors, run assessments, monitor risk continuously, automate lifecycle workflows, and generate audit-ready reporting – all in one operational system.

In practical terms:

  • Auditive helps procurement teams process vendor risk documentation faster.
  • VISO TRUST helps enterprises run vendor risk programs end-to-end.

Core Difference: Processing Risk Data vs. Running Risk Programs

Auditive

Auditive’s strength lies in using AI to review and extract intelligence from vendor documentation and compliance artifacts.

This helps teams:

  • Process questionnaires and evidence faster
  • Reduce manual document review
  • Accelerate procurement due diligence workflows
  • Extract control information from vendor materials

However, procurement teams must still manage:

  • Vendor onboarding workflows
  • Assessment orchestration
  • Lifecycle reassessments
  • Continuous monitoring
  • Vendor communication
  • Risk governance and reporting
  • Audit readiness

Auditive improves processing efficiency, but does not provide a full operational TPRM system.

VISO TRUST

VISO TRUST delivers the operational backbone enterprises need to run vendor risk programs at scale.

Security and procurement teams gain:

  • Automated onboarding and lifecycle workflows
  • AI-enabled vendor assessments in seconds
  • Continuous monitoring across vendors and downstream providers
  • Automated reassessments triggered by risk changes
  • Evidence-backed assurance and audit-ready outputs
  • Executive and board-ready reporting
  • Vendor collaboration workflows that reduce chasing

Instead of optimizing just procurement intake, VISO TRUST modernizes the entire vendor risk lifecycle.

Where Differences Matter in Practice

Scope of impact

Auditive:

  • Improves procurement intake efficiency
  • Still requires separate tools for risk governance and monitoring

VISO TRUST:

  • Covers onboarding through offboarding
  • Supports security, procurement, risk, and audit stakeholders

Continuous assurance

Auditive:

  • Focused on documentation intake events

VISO TRUST:

  • Continuously monitors vendor risk posture
  • Automatically triggers reassessments when change occurs

Operational scalability

Auditive:

  • Speeds document review
  • Operational workload still grows with vendor count

VISO TRUST:

  • Automation reduces lifecycle overhead
  • Programs scale without proportional staff growth

Vendor collaboration

Auditive:

  • Helps process vendor submissions

VISO TRUST:

  • Makes vendor engagement easier, driving faster responses and less friction

Strategic Choice

Organizations evaluating Auditive and VISO TRUST are often deciding between:

Optimizing procurement document processing

or

Modernizing how vendor risk is managed across the enterprise

Auditive helps teams process documentation faster.

VISO TRUST helps enterprises make faster, defensible vendor risk decisions at scale.

Auditive uses AI agents to accelerate procurement risk processing.

VISO TRUST uses AI to run vendor risk programs end-to-end.

As vendor ecosystems expand and risk expectations rise, enterprises increasingly need more than faster document processing – they need operational automation, continuous intelligence, and governance-ready risk decisions.