PCI risk assessments

Simplify PCI DSS v4.0 vendor assessments with automated evidence intake and continuous monitoring.

What is PCI DSS?

The Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard (PCI DSS) is a global standard from the PCI Security Standards Council (PCI SSC). It applies to entities that store, process, or transmit payment account data — and to third-party service providers (TPSPs) that can affect the cardholder-data environment (CDE).

Validation is performed via SAQ (self-assessment) or by a QSA resulting in a ROC and AOC.

Common control areas

Typical artifacts

PCI DSS requirements for third-party risk

12.8.1

Maintain an accurate

12.8.2/12.9

Use written agreements with responsibility acknowledgements

12.8.3

Perform formal due diligence before engagement

12.8.4

Monitor compliance at least annually

12.8.5

Document shared responsibilities

In practice

1

Define TPSP scope clearly

Establish clear boundaries for what third-party services are in scope for PCI DSS requirements.

2

Verify assessments cover your services

Ensure that vendor assessments actually cover the specific services you consume.

3

Enforce contract obligations

Include incident notification, right to assess, reporting cadence, and subprocessor disclosure in agreements.

4

Monitor expirations and changes

Track certificate expirations, scope changes, and material updates to vendor environments.

5

Coordinate incident response

Establish clear procedures for incident notification and coordinated response with vendors.

6

Keep audit-ready records

Maintain comprehensive documentation that’s always ready for internal or external audits.

Challenges in Manual PCI DSS Assessments

Evidence scattered across emails and spreadsheets

Manual tracking makes it difficult to maintain a comprehensive view of vendor compliance documentation and status.

SAQ selection and TPSP scope confusion

Determining the right self-assessment questionnaire and understanding vendor scope can be complex and error-prone.

Slow follow-ups and unclear ownership

Without automated workflows, tracking responsibilities and following up on missing evidence creates delays.

Inconsistent reviewer scoring

Different reviewers may assess the same evidence differently, leading to inconsistent risk evaluations.

Limited visibility into subcontractors/sub-providers

Understanding the full chain of payment processing and data handling across sub-providers is challenging.

Assurance that goes stale between annual validations

Point-in-time assessments don’t capture changes, incidents, or expired certifications between review cycles.

How VISO TRUST streamlines PCI vendor validation

automated artifact collection

Automated artifact collection

Evidence validation

evidence validation
targeted risk analyses

Targeted risk analyses (v4.0)

Continuous assurance

continuous assurance

Frequently asked questions

If a provider stores, processes, transmits, or can impact payment account data, they’re expected to meet PCI DSS and provide validation (AOC/ROC or SAQ). Buyers commonly request this during onboarding.

SAQ: self-assessment (for eligible entities). ROC: QSA-led report. AOC: attestation confirming scope and status.

Penalties are set by card brands and enforced via acquiring banks. Consequences may include fines, added validation, higher fees, or loss of processing privileges.

Use VISO TRUST for PCI compliance automation: orchestrate outreach, intake, evidence checks, remediation tracking, and reporting.

Yes. We collect TPSP evidence (AOC/ROC, responsibility matrices) and keep monitoring PCI compliance vendors, with alerts when scope or sub-providers change.

Stop chasing evidence. Start proving PCI DSS compliance.